| |
| Page - 1 2 3 4 5 |
| |
 |
| |
| SEXUAL HARASSMENT CLAIM DISMISSED |
| (Balding-Margolis v. Cleveland Arcade, 6th Cir.) |
| |
| GENDER BASED DISCRIMINATORY HARASSMENT DOES NOT HAVE TO BE SEXUAL |
| (EEOC v. National Educ. Ass'n Alaska) |
| |
| NO DUTY TO INVESTIGATE |
| (Hardage v. CBS Broad. Inc., 9th Cir.) |
| |
| ARBITRATION PROVISION |
| (EEOC v. Woodmen of the World Life Ins. Soc'y, D. Neb.) |
| |
| WAS COMPLAINT ABOUT SEXUAL HARASSMENT REASONABLE? |
| (Olson v. Lowe's Home Ctrs., 11th Cir.) |
| |
| EMPLOYER NOT LIABLE FOR SUPERVISOR'S BOORISH BEHAVIOR |
| (Thompson v. Naphcare Inc., 5th Cir.) |
| |
| NO AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE WHERE SUPERVISOR WITNESSED HARASSMENT |
| (Clark v. UPS 6th Cir.) |
| |
| MINISTER CAN SUE FOR SEXUAL HARASSMENT |
| (Dolquist v. Heartland Presbytery D. Kan.) |
| |
| SEXUAL PROPOSITIONS AND GROPING BY PRIEST NOT UNLAWFUL SEXUAL HARASSMENT |
| (Le Grand v. Area Res. for County and Human Services 8th Cir.) |
| |
| MAN HARASSED FOR NOT BEING "MANLY" |
| (EEOC v. Grief Bros. Corp. WDNY) |
| |
| TEASING IS NOT SEXUAL HARASSMENT |
| (Singleton v. Department of Corr. Educ. 4th Cir.) |
| |
| FIRING ONE OF THE "GOOD OLD BOYS" |
| (Steinhauer v. DeGolier, 7th Cir.) |
| |
| ABORTION RIGHTS ACTIVIST FIRED BY CATHOLIC SCHOOL |
| (Curay-Cramer v. Ursuline Academy of Wilmington, Del. Inc. D. Del.) |
| |
| A SEXUALLY PERMISSIVE WORKPLACE DOESN'T MEAN SEXUAL HARASSMENT |
| (Kriescher v. Fox Hills Golf Resort, 7th Circuit) |
| |
| GENDER NONCONFORMITY BIAS |
| (Kastl v. Maricopa County Community College (D. Ariz.)) |
| |
| GRAD STUDENT MAY SUE FOR SEX DISCRIMINATION |
| (Cuddleback v. Florida Board of Education 11th Cir.) |
| |
| MORGAN STANLEY TO PAY $54 MILLION |
| (EEOC v. Morgan Stanley & Co., S.D.N.Y.) |
| |
| MEDICAL RECORDS DISCOVERABLE |
| (Owens v. Sprint, D. Kan.) |
| |
| MOTHERHOOD |
| (Back v. Hastings on Hudson Union Free School District) |
| |
| $15 MILLION IN PUNITIVE DAMAGES AWARDED BY JURY |
| (Nestler v. Chartwells Dining Servs., N.D.N.Y.) |
| |
| CAN YOU RESIGN AND THEN COMPLAIN ABOUT SEXUAL HARASSMENT? |
| (Pennsylvania State Police v. Suders) |
| |
| FOUR YEARS OF DAILY OFFENSIVE STATEMENTS DOES NOT ESTABLISH TITLE VII CLAIM |
| (Brewington v. City of Lone Jack) |
| |
| OWNER WANTED BASEBALL MANAGER WHO WOULD PROVIDE SEXUAL FAVORS |
| (Alwine v. Buzas) |
| |
| SUPERVISOR'S SEXUAL ASSAULT DOES NOT VIOLATE TITLE VII |
| (Walton v. Johnson & Johnson Servs. Inc., 11th Cir.) |
| |
| SEXUAL HARASSMENT CLAIM DISMISSED |
| (Gibson v. Crucible Materials Corp., N.D.N.Y.) |
| |
| GLASS CEILING CLAIM FAILS |
| (Croy v. COBE Laboratories Inc., 10th Cir.) |
| |
| DESTRUCTION OF ELECTRONIC DATA |
| (Wiginton v. CB Richard Ellis, N.D. Ill.) |
| |
| SEX BET NOT UNLAWFUL |
| (Angevine v. WaterSaver Faucet Co., N.D. Ill.) |
| |
| "BAREFOOT AND PREGNANT" |
| (Volovsek v. Wisconsin Dept. of Agric. 7th Cir.) |
| |
|
| |
| Page - 1 2 3 4 5 |
| |
